Definition, Rechtschreibung, Synonyme und Grammatik von 'Jurisdiktion' auf Duden online nachschlagen. Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Die kirchliche Jurisdiktion bezeichnet die Rechts- und Verwaltungshoheit eines Ordinarius in seiner Partikularkirche (Jurisdiktionsgebiet). Alle noch zu erbauenden bzw. noch zu weihenden Kirchen und Klöster wurden unter die Jurisdiktion des Erzbischofs gestellt. Die bereits bestehenden.
Jurisdiktion (Kirche)Die kirchliche Jurisdiktion bezeichnet die Rechts- und Verwaltungshoheit eines Ordinarius in seiner Partikularkirche (Jurisdiktionsgebiet). den im bisherigen Verlauf der Untersuchung entwickelten Anforderungen genügendes Konzept konsistenter Jurisdiktion gegründet werden könnte. d. Jurisdiktion (Deutsch). Wortart: Substantiv, (weiblich). Silbentrennung: Ju|ris|dik|ti|on, Mehrzahl: Ju|ris|dik|ti|o|nen. Aussprache/Betonung.
Jurisdiktion Examples from the Internet (not verified by PONS Editors) VideoHvad er Territorial jurisdiktion?
Follow us. Choose a dictionary. Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English. Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English. Word Lists.
Choose your language. My word lists. Tell us about this example sentence:. The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word. The sentence contains offensive content.
Cancel Submit. Your feedback will be reviewed. Want to learn more? Related word jurisdictional. The Supreme Court ruled that the US government had no jurisdiction over crimes committed on Indian lands.
A law passed in sought to strip the federal courts of jurisdiction to consider the detainees ' plight.
Cable and satellite channels are outside the jurisdiction of the FCC. Privileged Relations Hengeler Mueller maintains privileged relationships with leading independent law firms in Europe and the United States as well as in all other major jurisdictions worldwide..
November auf der Internetseite unter www. Personen wie in Regulation S unter dem U. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell securities in the United States of America, or in Canada, Australia, Japan or other jurisdictions in which an offer is subject to statutory restrictions..
It is solely with prior registration or, if without prior registration, solely on the basis of an exemption, that the securities named in this press release are permitted to be sold or offered for sale in the United States of America or to U.
Mit dieser Frage befassen sich Marian Niestedt und Dr. In dieser Publikation beschreiben Experten aus 24 verschiedenen Jurisdiktionen die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen für ausländische Investitionen in ihren jeweiligen Ländern, darunter neben Deutschland unter anderem auch China, Indien und die USA..
In this publication, experts from 24 different jurisdictions describe the general legal framework for foreign investments in their respective countries.
Under the headings Law and Policy, Procedure, Substantive Assessment and Recent Cases, the two GvW lawyers provide an overview of the legal framework applicable to foreign investments in Germany..
During this time, the monastery belonged to the first Danish province of the order ;. We are using the following form field to detect spammers.
Please do leave them untouched. Otherwise your message will be regarded as spam. We are sorry for the inconvenience. Please note that the vocabulary items in this list are only available in this browser.
Once you have copied them to the vocabulary trainer, they are available from everywhere. Hallo Welt. DE EN. My search history My favourites.
All the other judges work there part-time and attend the Ordinary Sessions every three months. Up to now, 26 African states have recognised the jurisdiction of the Court, and five of these — Mali, Malawi, Tanzania, Burkina Faso and Ghana — have also recognised petitions submitted by individuals.
In , the Court passed its provisional Rules of Court. Die 24 Kapitel der Publikation sind einheitlich aufgebaut, sodass jederzeit ein Vergleich über die Rechtslage in den verschiedenen Jurisdiktionen — von Australien bis Vietnam — vorgenommen werden kann.
Nutzer korrekt verlinken. Subjekt im Singular, Verb im Plural? Tschüs — richtig ausgesprochen. Was ist ein Satz?
Wiederholungen von Wörtern. Wohin kommen die Anführungszeichen? So liegen Sie immer richtig. Die längsten Wörter im Dudenkorpus.
Kommasetzung bei bitte. Subjekts- und Objektsgenitiv. Adverbialer Akkusativ. Aus dem Nähkästchen geplaudert. Haar, Faden und Damoklesschwert.
Kontamination von Redewendungen. Lehnwörter aus dem Etruskischen. Insofar as these bodies or nominated individuals may resolve disputes through judicial or quasi-judicial means, or promote treaty obligations in the nature of laws, the power ceded to these bodies cumulatively represents its own jurisdiction.
But no matter how powerful each body may appear to be, the extent to which any of their judgments may be enforced, or proposed treaties and conventions may become, or remain, effective within the territorial boundaries of each nation is a political matter under the sovereign control each nation.
The fact that international organizations, courts and tribunals have been created raises the difficult question of how to co-ordinate their activities with those of national courts.
If the two sets of bodies do not have concurrent jurisdiction but, as in the case of the International Criminal Court ICC , the relationship is expressly based on the principle of complementarity , i.
But if the jurisdiction claimed is concurrent or, as in the case of International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ICTY , the international tribunal is to prevail over national courts, the problems are more difficult to resolve politically.
The idea of universal jurisdiction is fundamental to the operation of global organizations such as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice ICJ , which jointly assert the benefit of maintaining legal entities with jurisdiction over a wide range of matters of significance to nations the ICJ should not be confused with the ICC and this version of "universal jurisdiction" is not the same as that enacted in the War Crimes Law Belgium , which is an assertion of extraterritorial jurisdiction that will fail to gain implementation in any other state under the standard provisions of public policy.
Under Article 34 Statute of the ICJ  only nations may be parties in cases before the Court and, under Article 36, the jurisdiction comprises all cases which the parties refer to it and all matters specially provided for in the Charter of the United Nations or in treaties and conventions in force.
But, to invoke the jurisdiction in any given case, all the parties have to accept the prospective judgment as binding.
This reduces the risk of wasting the Court's time. Despite the safeguards built into the constitutions of most of these organizations, courts and tribunals, the concept of universal jurisdiction is controversial among those nations which prefer unilateral to multilateral solutions through the use of executive or military authority, sometimes described as realpolitik -based diplomacy.
Within other international contexts, there are intergovernmental organizations such as the World Trade Organization WTO that have socially and economically significant dispute resolution functions but, again, even though their jurisdiction may be invoked to hear the cases, the power to enforce their decisions is at the will of the nations affected, save that the WTO is permitted to allow retaliatory action by successful nations against those nations found to be in breach of international trade law.
At a regional level, groups of nations can create political and legal bodies with sometimes complicated patchworks of overlapping provisions detailing the jurisdictional relationships between the member states and providing for some degree of harmonization between their national legislative and judicial functions, for example, the European Union and African Union both have the potential to become federated nations although the political barriers to such unification in the face of entrenched nationalism will be very difficult to overcome.
Each such group may form transnational institutions with declared legislative or judicial powers. For example, in Europe, the European Court of Justice has been given jurisdiction as the ultimate appellate court to the member states on issues of European law.
This jurisdiction is entrenched and its authority could only be denied by a member nation if that member nation asserts its sovereignty and withdraws from the union.
The standard treaties and conventions leave the issue of implementation to each nation, i. Hence, citizens in those nations can invoke the jurisdiction of local courts to enforce rights granted under international law wherever there is incorporation.
If there is no direct effect or legislation, there are two theories to justify the courts incorporating international into municipal law:.
In the United States, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution makes all treaties that have been ratified under the authority of the United States and customary international law a part of the "Supreme Law of the Land" along with the Constitution itself and acts of Congress passed pursuant to it U.
VI Cl. According to the Supreme Court of the United States , the treaty power authorizes Congress to legislate under the Necessary and Proper Clause in areas beyond those specifically conferred on Congress Missouri v.
Holland , U. This concerns the relationships both between courts in different jurisdictions , and between courts within the same jurisdiction. The usual legal doctrine under which questions of jurisdiction are decided is termed forum non conveniens.
To deal with the issue of forum shopping , nations are urged to adopt more positive rules on conflict of laws.
The Hague Conference and other international bodies have made recommendations on jurisdictional matters, but litigants with the encouragement of lawyers on a contingent fee continue to shop for forums.
Under international law there are different principles that are recognized to establish a State's ability to exercise criminal jurisdiction when it comes to a person.
There is no hierarchy when it comes to any of the principles. States must therefore work together to solve issues of who may exercise their jurisdiction when it comes to issues of multiple principles being allowed.
Territorial Principle : This principle states that the State where the crime has been committed may exercise jurisdiction. This is one of the most straightforward and least controversial of the principles.
This is also the only principle that is territorial in nature; all other forms are extraterritorial. Nationality Principle also known as the Active Personality Principle : This principle is based around a person's nationality and allows States to exercise jurisdiction when it comes to their nationality, both within and outside the State's territory.